A SECRET WEAPON FOR H4831 VS H4831SC

A Secret Weapon For h4831 vs h4831sc

A Secret Weapon For h4831 vs h4831sc

Blog Article

I am an actual supporter of the H4831 powder. I get terrific velocity and accuracy away from any caliber I have tried out it in. From the 25-06 up for the 338 it can be my head over to powder of preference. I attempt every type of powders when Doing work up loads, though the H4831 always appears to appear out on top rated for precision and velocity when the situation is with the 06 course or much larger.

Not surprisingly, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of different great deal figures, but I do think I understand why. It's a litigation-pushed environment, plus some idiot would definitely deduce that he could blend H380 and H110 and think of his very own personalized mixture of powder. What a earth.

This has become the most significant good reasons reloaders are admonished to work with new data only; and to begin reduced every time you can get a completely new wide range of powder. You don't truly know (Until the business tells you so) that the new great deal of powder was even made at a similar manufacturing facility given that the powder you acquire a few years back.

Of course it is possible to. They may be exactly the same correct powder although the SC powder is just Slice shorter so it meters greater.

Novice to reloading. This is going to be useful for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I used to be capable to get my fingers on a couple kilos of h4831.

Any load data to aid that? My 1st assumed is it isn't intending to burn every one h4831 vs h4831sc of the way and velocities will be slow and in every single place. May be a nice fireworks Screen!

If there is no load data it is because this powder is not really suited to this cartridge. Commonly one particular is not going to discover one particular powder h4831sc load data to fit all cartridges, and the relatives of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you are inquiring about will not work.

and you might like to spend money on some new load data publications. powder composition and chemistry can does adjust through the years. 4831 powder of decades ago isn't identical as precisely what is now available. that may be why a person serious about reloading safely may have essentially the most current load data books to make reference to.

I've located the precise reverse to generally be accurate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally correct powder in my 300 Acquire Mag.

Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain dimension, for that reason, the designation SC or small cut. The shorter, a lot more compact kernels allow the powder to stream from the powder measures far more efficiently, assisting to reduce the regular chopping of granules.

Despite the similarity in nomenclature, They are totally unique powders, with IMR 4831 getting significantly more quickly than the Hodgdon variants. Will not treat them as precisely the same powder, since they most undoubtedly are usually not.

Certainly, you can use the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, but the SC version may possibly enable you to get somewhat a lot more in scenarios h4831sc load data where you are maxing out circumstance quantity With all the regular powder prior to achieving force limitations.

arkansas or ohio i under no circumstances discovered a big difference apart from the regular is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan.

The container didn't hold the "Severe" emblem on it. A coworker and I then swapped some powder, And that i wound up with Yet another pound of H4831SC, this a single With all the "Intense" logo on it.

Report this page